How does the 'Geopolitical' Commission perform and what should be its stances vis-à-vis key international players?

In light of the increasingly volatile geopolitical context, how do you assess the performance of the 'geopolitical' Commission so far?
What should EU positions be in relation to the US, UK, China, Turkey, Russia or Brazil?
Tell us your views in this special survey (it only takes 5 minutes)!

You can get a trial premium account (valid for 3 days) if you take part in our survey!

The best data - based overview of EU politics

Motions for resolutions - On-going negotiations for a new EU-ACP Partnership Agreement


Vote details

Paragraph 25
For
295 (49%)
Against
286 (47%)
Abstentions
22 (4%)
Required to pass
291
Date of vote:
28.11.2019
ID:
457
Final vote:
No
  Group cohesion:
89%
  Total members:
749
  Voters:
603
  Didn`t vote:
87
  Absent:
58
Policy area:
Development
Type of vote:
Motion for resolution
Procedure:
Non-Legislative
Majority formed by:
See other votes on the same dossier: 1

Filter by

Name Group Member State Vote Loyal / Rebel to political group Member State Loyal / Rebel to political group Vote Group
Export data
Group For Against Abstentions Total
present
Total
absent
Total
non voters
Total
members
Cohesion
Export data
Group Loyal Rebel Total
present
Total
absent
Total
non voters
Total
members
Cohesion
Export data
Member State For Against Abstentions Total
present
Total
absent
Total
non voters
Total
members
Cohesion
Export data

Related votes

Export data